Rendered at 11:28:49 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
killiancarroll 2 hours ago [-]
Well put, and I think the problem extends beyond agentic systems to regular software. Someone in an organisation whips up a useful product, publishes it and is now on the hook for bug fixes, feature requests and operations. The maintenance cost is often much larger than the cost of building it now that producing an MVP is so easy.
munchler 16 minutes ago [-]
It actually extends to all automation, even before computers. Replacing oxen with tractors? Now you have to keep the tractors running.
Frankybeatz 34 minutes ago [-]
[flagged]
shibaprasadb 2 hours ago [-]
Writing about the operating cost of AI tools while the whole article is a complete AI slop. :)
8-prime 1 hours ago [-]
Whether written with AI or not, I don't necessarily agree with the sentiment that it's AI slop. We too often only categorize between no AI used and AI slop.
Does them using AI to write the article invalidate the points stated in any way? I personally don't think so. I too am weary of constant bombardment with AI but at the same time being against something just because AI was in the loop isn't much better, if at all.
shibaprasadb 1 hours ago [-]
I see no issues in articles where AI was in the loop or made the article better than it otherwise would have been. Why not?
But if 100% is generated by AI - and you just prompted it - then I would like to avoid that piece. Personally.
kombookcha 51 minutes ago [-]
If it wasn't worth writing for the author, it won't be worth reading for you and I. If you have a point to make, putting it into words is part of how you structure and understand it yourself. I would much rather read a point imperfectly made by a person, than a bunch of algo-noise around the fuzzy outline of a point that nobody has thought through.
If you value your finite human time and attention you have to somehow sift through the deluge of slop and the simplest, most effective filter is to immediately ditch anything that fails the slop sniff test. You are not owed readers.
owebmaster 1 hours ago [-]
> We too often only categorize between no AI used and AI slop
We do not. You might have not noticed but we don't discuss the use of AI when nobody notices that AI was used.
8-prime 1 hours ago [-]
Yeah of course not. When nobody notices, then there is nothing to discuss. Otherwise it would just be conjecuture. And by that logic anything where AI is noticable would be categorizable as AI slop. Which is exactly what I'm criticizing
brazukadev 51 minutes ago [-]
don't post slop then. If AI is noticeable, it is AI slop.
knollimar 43 minutes ago [-]
I think there's a difference. Sometimes you'll see some random LLM tells like load-bearing if looking, but you don't notice on a first pass. Those are fine. Slop is slop
5 days ago [-]
tatsuya-tamaya 2 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
stubbi 60 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
Etheryte 53 minutes ago [-]
Probably one of the most reused and generic patterns in logos, you can find countless sites and businesses with something like that.
stubbi 53 minutes ago [-]
Then it might be my perception bias that I only realize now!
Does them using AI to write the article invalidate the points stated in any way? I personally don't think so. I too am weary of constant bombardment with AI but at the same time being against something just because AI was in the loop isn't much better, if at all.
But if 100% is generated by AI - and you just prompted it - then I would like to avoid that piece. Personally.
If you value your finite human time and attention you have to somehow sift through the deluge of slop and the simplest, most effective filter is to immediately ditch anything that fails the slop sniff test. You are not owed readers.
We do not. You might have not noticed but we don't discuss the use of AI when nobody notices that AI was used.